Abstract

According to the schedufe in the iearning process the main eiement is considered to be checking studente knowfedge and their correct organisation. This articfe examines the positive and negative aspects of computer testing

Keywords

computer testing, graphics, descriptive geometry, engineering graphics, technology, modul , carving

References

  1. Avanesov, V.S. (1995). Theoretical foundations of developing test items. Manual for faculty. Moscow: Moscow Textile Institute Press.

  2. Mayorov, A.N. (2000). Theory and practice of creating tests for the education system. Moscow. 

  3. Verbitsky, A.A., & Puchkova, E.B. (2013). Test potential as a means of diagnosing education quality: Myths and reality. Higher Education in Russia, 6, 33-44.

  4. Jusupov, A.A., & Isaev, I.I. (2018). Collection of tests in descriptive geometry and engineering graphics. Osh.

  5. Markova, O.A. (2017). Tests in engineering graphics: Collection of test tasks. Nizhnekamsk: Guzel Publishing Center.

  6. Markova, O.A. (2016). Non-traditional approaches to creating tests in engineering graphics. Current Problems of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 11, 52-55.

  7. Toktosunov, A.A., & Toktobaeva, G.T. (2016). Contemporary problems of teaching engineering graphics. International Scientific Journal of Osh University: Science. Education. Technology, 3-4(57), 17.

  8. Toktosunov, A.A., & Toktobaeva, G.T. (2018). Main components of organizing students' independent work in descriptive geometry. International Scientific Journal Juvenis Scientia, 6, 21-23.

Suggested citation

Zhusupov, A. (2025). THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SIDES OF COMPUTER TESTING IN GRAPHICS CLASSES. News of Osh Technological University, 25(1), 222-226.